The slot width does matter as well. The 3" (really? 3"? that seems pretty large) slot of CCrafts setup is pretty large and undoubtedly hurting his fines separation - although as he notes he doesn't care ;D.
I ended up widening my slot to 2", which is still wider than normal, due to the behavior of the shavings off of my planer. I noticed a difference in sucking up piles of sanding dust in my tests with that vs a smaller slow. Basically I put a clean cloth filter over the outlet and sucked up a big pile of sanding dust and saw how much made it to the filter. At 1.25" it did better than at 2", but it was really the difference between practically invisible and fairly noticeable but still darn good.
I don't know if anyone has done any studies on slot width vs HP/CFM (vs all the other things that matter like: separator diameter - bigger separates more but hits your cfm more, inlet/outlet placement, etc... etc...) but more info is interesting.
Based on comparing reviews and observed performance at the low-mid range I'd say that Phils baffle works at least as well and in at least some cases better than a lot of the crappier cyclones and about as well as some of the better ones. At the high end I haven't seen anyone who has done any sort of comparison so... for ease of build and straight up performance the baffle is still a huge win in my book and while a cyclone _may_ work better at fines separation it will also eat more CFM and is a lot harder/more expensive to build.
If I ever find a higher powered blower cheap I'm still planning on doing another one, hoping to find at least a 3HP or better a 5HP and see how it works ;D
I ended up widening my slot to 2", which is still wider than normal, due to the behavior of the shavings off of my planer. I noticed a difference in sucking up piles of sanding dust in my tests with that vs a smaller slow. Basically I put a clean cloth filter over the outlet and sucked up a big pile of sanding dust and saw how much made it to the filter. At 1.25" it did better than at 2", but it was really the difference between practically invisible and fairly noticeable but still darn good.
I don't know if anyone has done any studies on slot width vs HP/CFM (vs all the other things that matter like: separator diameter - bigger separates more but hits your cfm more, inlet/outlet placement, etc... etc...) but more info is interesting.
Based on comparing reviews and observed performance at the low-mid range I'd say that Phils baffle works at least as well and in at least some cases better than a lot of the crappier cyclones and about as well as some of the better ones. At the high end I haven't seen anyone who has done any sort of comparison so... for ease of build and straight up performance the baffle is still a huge win in my book and while a cyclone _may_ work better at fines separation it will also eat more CFM and is a lot harder/more expensive to build.
If I ever find a higher powered blower cheap I'm still planning on doing another one, hoping to find at least a 3HP or better a 5HP and see how it works ;D